From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] Line-In
From: anothy@cosym.net
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-Id: <20020228170931.84E90199EE@mail.cse.psu.edu>
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 12:09:18 -0500
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 5c0bb506-eaca-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

glad BladeEnc is working for you. as the page i
referenced notes, i think your results from LAME
match what i was seeing. rsc noted earlier that
LAME and /dev/audio disagree about byte order
in the samples; i've lost my LAME binary, so i
can't confirm that this makes my issue go away,
but if you have LAME around you could try the
command he posted:
	lame -v -rx -S --preset cd $i $i.mp3 && rm $i
and see if that produces more sensable mp3s. it'd
be nice to have both LAME and BladeEnc working,
since they're better at different things.
ア