Received: from mail.cse.psu.edu ([130.203.4.6]) by aquamar; Thu Feb 28 22:19:23 MET 2002
Received: from psuvax1.cse.psu.edu (psuvax1.cse.psu.edu [130.203.8.6])
	by mail.cse.psu.edu (CSE Mail Server) with ESMTP
	id 19BB819A29; Thu, 28 Feb 2002 16:19:12 -0500 (EST)
Delivered-To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Received: from utrhcs.cs.utwente.nl (utrhcs.cs.utwente.nl [130.89.10.247])
	by mail.cse.psu.edu (CSE Mail Server) with ESMTP id A379C199E4
	for <9fans@cse.psu.edu>; Thu, 28 Feb 2002 16:18:03 -0500 (EST)
Received: from zeus.cs.utwente.nl (zeus.cs.utwente.nl [130.89.10.12])
	by utrhcs.cs.utwente.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA22856
	for <9fans@cse.psu.edu>; Thu, 28 Feb 2002 22:18:01 +0100 (MET)
Received: from copernicus.cs.utwente.nl by zeus.cs.utwente.nl (8.10.2+Sun/csrelay-Sol1.4/RB)
	id g1SLHw318548; Thu, 28 Feb 2002 22:17:59 +0100 (MET)
Received: from localhost (belinfan@localhost)
	by copernicus.cs.utwente.nl (8.11.6+Sun/8.10.2) with SMTP id g1SLHxd21267
	for <9fans@cse.psu.edu>; Thu, 28 Feb 2002 22:17:59 +0100 (MET)
Message-Id: <200202282117.g1SLHxd21267@copernicus.cs.utwente.nl>
X-Authentication-Warning: copernicus.cs.utwente.nl: belinfan@localhost didn't use HELO protocol
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 with version: MH 6.8.3 #20[UCI]
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] fs config problem status update (still unsolved)
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 28 Feb 2002 16:09:07 -0500."
             <6f1e535b5006a4d39a822acbd26f140e@plan9.bell-labs.com> 
References: <6f1e535b5006a4d39a822acbd26f140e@plan9.bell-labs.com> 
From: Axel Belinfante <Axel.Belinfante@cs.utwente.nl>
X-Organisation: University of Twente, Department of Computer Science,
                Formal Methods and Tools Group,
                PO Box 217, NL-7500 AE Enschede, The Netherlands
X-Phone: +31 53 4893774
X-Telefax: +31 53 4893247
X-Face: 3YGZY^_!}k]>-k'9$LK?8GXbi?vs=2v*ut,/8z,z!(QNBk_>~:~"MJ_%i`sLLqGN,DGbkT@
 N\jhX/jNLTz2hO_R"*RF(%bRvk+M,iU7SvVJtC*\B6Ud<7~`MGMp7rCI6LVp=%k=HE?-UCV?[p\$R?
 mI\n2/!#3/wZZsa[m7d;PKWiuH6'~<x[UoHs%Ei=QZA
X-Url: http://www.cs.utwente.nl/~belinfan/
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: 9fans-admin@cse.psu.edu
Errors-To: 9fans-admin@cse.psu.edu
X-BeenThere: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.8
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
List-Help: <mailto:9fans-request@cse.psu.edu?subject=help>
List-Id: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans.cse.psu.edu>
List-Archive: <https://lists.cse.psu.edu/archives/9fans/>
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 22:17:59 +0100

> > Is the ide-patched fs kernel 'compatible' with the plan9pc one?
> > Or do the on-disk structures differ (w.r.t. 'using 16K blocks') 
> 
> it's just a compile-time constant; you can recompile, right?


Certainly. But with my fs in the state that it is now,
I thought I'd try for a change to ask (a) question(s) first,
rather than only after the calf has drowned :-)
(or however you say this in english).

Thanks for confirming that indeed this is a compile time constant,
Axel.