From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-Id: <200203011035.g21AZF907552@copernicus.cs.utwente.nl>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] fs config problem status update (still unsolved)
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 01 Mar 2002 09:09:04 +0100."
             <20020301080917.190D7199B3@mail.cse.psu.edu> 
References: <20020301080917.190D7199B3@mail.cse.psu.edu> 
From: Axel Belinfante <Axel.Belinfante@cs.utwente.nl>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Fri,  1 Mar 2002 11:35:15 +0100
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 5d500264-eaca-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

> I changed the constant to use 16K blocks, since I think that would
> probably be better for speed and disks are big. But if you have
> problems to recompile it send me a mail and I'll put a binary with
> 8K blocks for you to download.

Thanks for the offer. Recompiling in itself shouldn't be a problem.
After running diff between the original fs and the patched code
I was just trying to make sure which differences can be ignored
(almost all, I understand now) and which need attention
(the block size, which is (solely) determined by RBUFSIZE, correct?)

Axel.