From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] fs config problem status update (still unsolved)
From: Fco.J.Ballesteros <nemo@plan9.escet.urjc.es>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <20020301131639.45D89199B3@mail.cse.psu.edu>
Date: Fri,  1 Mar 2002 14:16:36 +0100
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 5d8278a2-eaca-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

: After running diff between the original fs and the patched code
: I was just trying to make sure which differences can be ignored
: (the block size, which is (solely) determined by RBUFSIZE, correct?)

correct, AFAIK