From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2002 16:25:52 -0500
From: William Josephson <jkw@eecs.harvard.edu>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] samuel
Message-ID: <20020310162552.A4478@honk.eecs.harvard.edu>
References: <5194db69d6a2bcb77be8696538794a50@plan9.bell-labs.com> <3.0.6.32.20020311101349.00998010@pop3.clear.net.nz>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <3.0.6.32.20020311101349.00998010@pop3.clear.net.nz>; from andrew@mbmnz.co.nz on Mon, Mar 11, 2002 at 10:13:49AM +1300
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 62fe5a44-eaca-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

On Mon, Mar 11, 2002 at 10:13:49AM +1300, Andrew Simmons wrote:
> >Samuel didn't make the grade.  If it had, I think it would still be
> >around.
> >
> Fair enough. I'd just like some way to find function definitions without
> changing the way I lay them out. grep ^nurdge *.c does have the appeal of
> simplicity, but I don't like adjusting my style to suit the machine.

To each his own: I find the style easier on the eyes :-/