From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2002 12:53:43 -0500
From: William Josephson <jkw@eecs.harvard.edu>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] Is this a bug in 8c?
Message-ID: <20020315125343.A32842@honk.eecs.harvard.edu>
References: <20020315115533.77C4319A8B@mail.cse.psu.edu> <874rjhbx8l.fsf@becket.becket.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <874rjhbx8l.fsf@becket.becket.net>; from tb+usenet@becket.net on Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 04:53:15PM +0000
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 680bb978-eaca-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 04:53:15PM +0000, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:

> The claim was that GCC trades optimization for correctness, when it
> certainly makes no such intentional trade.

Intention doesn't have much to do with it as far as I can tell.

> But 8c in fact *does* make such trades, either to save developer time,
> or just a deliberate "yes, this is wrong, but the generated code is
> faster!"

> Thomas

You're a really sore loser, you know that?