From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2002 11:15:48 -0500
From: William Josephson <jkw@eecs.harvard.edu>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] u9fs
Message-ID: <20020319111548.A54414@honk.eecs.harvard.edu>
References: <20020319140518.F2DC219A59@mail.cse.psu.edu> <000c01c1cf60$34683860$4bf0b487@dnrc.belllabs.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <000c01c1cf60$34683860$4bf0b487@dnrc.belllabs.com>; from dharani@lucent.com on Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 11:07:44AM -0500
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 69d80310-eaca-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 11:07:44AM -0500, Dharani Vilwanathan wrote:

> Can I safely assume that if I run u9fs on a linux box, it is as good as a
> plan 9 file server with which Plan 9 terminals can be connected?

No, it is substantially slower in my experience.
It serves a different purpose, namely accessing
Unix boxes.  That said, I have used it as a
replacement in a pinch.