From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Lucio De Re <lucio@proxima.alt.za>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] du
Message-ID: <20020321154719.I9019@cackle.proxima.alt.za>
References: <9ac634e947eb39000123f84271f9c74e@plan9.bell-labs.com> <20020321154427.H9019@cackle.proxima.alt.za>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
In-Reply-To: <20020321154427.H9019@cackle.proxima.alt.za>; from Lucio De Re on Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 03:44:27PM +0200
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2002 15:47:19 +0200
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 6baca664-eaca-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

On Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 03:44:27PM +0200, Lucio De Re wrote:
>
> No scripts that will break because of the change?  Du(1) is used quite
> extensively because of find's absence, I'd hate to be the one to
> create a problem by trying to be helful :-)
> 
And I tried to mail Rob exclusively, but Mutt obviously makes its own
decisions, so Rob got a duplicate message :-(

I guess I could have looked a little harder...

++L