From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Martin C.Atkins To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Subject: Re: [9fans] u9fs Message-Id: <20020324111442.0ad740ee.martin@mca-ltd.com> In-Reply-To: <2dce1fb5081907ad7bc2730a9b67c1dc@plan9.bell-labs.com> References: <2dce1fb5081907ad7bc2730a9b67c1dc@plan9.bell-labs.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2002 11:14:42 +0530 Topicbox-Message-UUID: 6d04a520-eaca-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025 Ahhhh. This was my problem too... On Sat, 23 Mar 2002 10:43:09 0000 nigel@9fs.org wrote: > You need to be in /etc/hosts of the unix machine, or equivalent > permissiony sort of thing. and On Sat, 23 Mar 2002 18:12:59 0000 "Russ Cox" wrote: > where by /etc/hosts, nigel means /etc/hosts.equiv > (or you can edit your own .rhosts). if you can rlogin > to the machine then you can mount it. > to whoever complains, i will point out > that this is no worse than nfs. > Wouldn't it be "sort of nice" if u9fs(4) mentioned this? :-) Martin -- Martin C. Atkins martin@mca-ltd.com Mission Critical Applications Ltd, U.K.