From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lucio De Re To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Subject: Re: [9fans] kl Message-ID: <20020402123209.U6290@cackle.proxima.alt.za> References: <20020402094046.1B00219988@mail.cse.psu.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20020402094046.1B00219988@mail.cse.psu.edu>; from forsyth@caldo.demon.co.uk on Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 10:37:12AM +0100 Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2002 12:32:10 +0200 Topicbox-Message-UUID: 71742478-eaca-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025 On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 10:37:12AM +0100, forsyth@caldo.demon.co.uk wrote: > > i think this is at least part of the problem (kl isn't up to date in > the released version, and hasn't got the xrefresolv changes). > it links cpu when i include them. i suppose there was a backwards > dependency somewhere. > Validated. I'm trying to build a "stable" system based on the March 27, 2001 distribution plus the few minor updates that followed. That much I have no trouble with. More difficult is going through the mail since October 2001 and picking all the little nits that have appeared on this list. Maybe in vain, I'd like to ask if anyone has actually tracked these separately and can either point me to them or forward them to me. Also, it may be asking a bit much, but perhaps we can add a short recognisable keyword on the subject header when a patch is involved. It would also help if one then stayed on topic . ++L