From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Christopher Nielsen <cnielsen@pobox.com>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] tlssrv
Message-ID: <20020617185908.GJ67502@cassie.foobarbaz.net>
References: <857fc7b9048629e29563854dcea6e3e7@9fs.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <857fc7b9048629e29563854dcea6e3e7@9fs.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2002 11:59:08 -0700
Topicbox-Message-UUID: b16e4770-eaca-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

On Mon, Jun 17, 2002 at 12:08:31PM +0100, nigel@9fs.org wrote:
> To my mind, tlssrv equals stunnel server mode.
>
> Thus, a tlsclient program equivalent to stunnel -c would
> seem to be the next step.

That makes a lot more sense than extending tlssrv to
handle stunnel -c. I'll have a go at it this week.

--
Christopher Nielsen - Metal-wielding pyro techie
"Those who are willing to trade freedom for security deserve
 neither freedom nor security." --Benjamin Franklin