From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-Id: <200206241916.PAA25304@math.psu.edu>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] Identity
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 24 Jun 2002 10:50:32 BST."
             <031101c21b64$94b318c0$6f64a8c0@blue>
From: Dan Cross <cross@math.psu.edu>
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2002 15:16:43 -0400
Topicbox-Message-UUID: b771d268-eaca-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

> > No. All the clothes were plumbed together from small generic
> > pieces, following the pipe/plumber ideas.
>
> Or mix 'n' match as us primitive beings call it.
>
> Not having seen the recent spate of films, my understanding of the
> force is weak, but wouldn't she have just used the spare space in
> her spouse's case? More load balancing than compression I think.

But she has no spouse yet; that's the point of the pseudo condom
commercial in the middle of the movie, where she and the obnoxiously
reticent jedi-to-be go frollicking in the middle of a flower field.
This movie was so lame....  What can I say?  The love scenes nearly
made me puke, and who *elects* a Queen at the age of 17 or whatever?

	- Dan C.