From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Dave <dave@dave.tj>
Subject: Re: [9fans] blanks in file names
In-reply-to: <20020710223823.44D7F19A7D@mail.cse.psu.edu> from
 <"arisawa@ar.aichi-u.ac.jp"@Jul>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Message-id: <200207110510.g6B5AxQ09299@dave2.dave.tj>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 01:10:59 -0400
Topicbox-Message-UUID: c912a696-eaca-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

Eh, I tire of the discussion ... let's just make a userland fix or
whatever ... if it bugs me too much, I'll just patch up the kernel,
or something. . .

 - Dave


arisawa@ar.aichi-u.ac.jp wrote:
> 
> Dave wrote:
> >If I had to vote a priori, blanks would certainly be a no-go for
> >filenames.  However, the pressure cooker has already burst, and our
> >...
> >keep our chicken from splattering all over the kitchen ;-/
> 
> Important or not? That is the problem.
> If we agree it is important, we must eat spaes.
> Then my chice is to cook spaces so that stomach is not broken.
> How to cook?
> I believe the first discussion should be forcussed
> to expression of path considering in future needs.
> I believe you and I share much opinion.
> 
> Kenji Arisawa
> 
>