From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Lucio De Re <lucio@proxima.alt.za>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] useful language extension, or no?
Message-ID: <20020717153351.D13546@cackle.proxima.alt.za>
References: <20020717134908.6cd4fcdb.spam@broster.co.uk> <Pine.LNX.4.30.0207170803450.16167-100000@athena>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0207170803450.16167-100000@athena>; from Sam on Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 08:12:14AM -0400
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2002 15:33:52 +0200
Topicbox-Message-UUID: cf349c00-eaca-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 08:12:14AM -0400, Sam wrote:
> 
> Methinks we can let this poor atend be.  We've beaten it
> enough ... he'll be sore for weeks.  Not only is it not
> worth modifying *any* language for, it's not worth putting
> into a new one.  I'm still glad I brought it up; this
> has been a good thread.
> 
Just as I was getting brave enough to suggest:

	for (x = 1 => { /* initialisation */ };
		x < num => { /* termination */ };
		x++ => { /* body */ };
	);

(syntactic spices to taste) ...

++L