From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Lucio De Re <lucio@proxima.alt.za>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] /sys/lib/plumb/basic
Message-ID: <20020723085804.W19813@cackle.proxima.alt.za>
References: <658fdbf77e9ca6b11a693826350c0029@granite.cias.osakafu-u.ac.jp>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
In-Reply-To: <658fdbf77e9ca6b11a693826350c0029@granite.cias.osakafu-u.ac.jp>; from okamoto@granite.cias.osakafu-u.ac.jp on Tue, Jul 23, 2002 at 03:24:53PM +0900
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2002 08:58:05 +0200
Topicbox-Message-UUID: d3bdf5b4-eaca-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

On Tue, Jul 23, 2002 at 03:24:53PM +0900, okamoto@granite.cias.osakafu-u.ac.jp wrote:
> 
> Then, I changed the line to
> 	arg isfile ./$1 /sys/include/$1
> , and killed the plumber processes, and restarted it.
> Then, I got the expected result.
> 
> Kenji  --sorry my vague English (anytime ;_;)

I think the idea is not to have both trees available simultaneously:

	bind /3e/sys /sys

at least in some of the windows, and the plumbing rules will take
care of themselves.  You could just start a new plumber in the new
namespace, but I would feel more comfortable with a new rio, I
think.

++L