From: "Roman V. Shaposhnick" <vugluskr@unicorn.math.spbu.ru>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: [9fans] Ephase question.
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 05:26:18 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020813052618.A10336@unicorn.math.spbu.ru> (raw)
Hi everybody,
digging inside 4th edition gave me some very unexpected results
in terms of file access semantics in user space. But let me show
a scenario first:
first-user$ cat > /shared-directory/file
blah-blah-blah
second-user$ rm /shared-directory/file
[first user after hitting <CR> ]
"phase error -- directory entry not allocated"
I was a little bit shocked at first, mainly because I've got so used to
UNIX semantics of "once you get it -- it's yours", that I've been taking
it for granted in Plan9 as well.
Suddenly I can't remember how 3nd and 2nd editions behaved.
Before now I was under the impression that regular unopened fids are mostly
used for reference counting and once you grab a fid nobody can kill the
actual object it refers to, but 4th edition proved me wrong. Even though
I still can't understand why it behaves this way. Could somebody explain
the rationale behind that to me, please ? And I'm really curios now about
what obligations server is supposed to have when it accepts a new fid from
a client for a given object.
Thanks,
Roman.
next reply other threads:[~2002-08-13 1:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-08-13 1:26 Roman V. Shaposhnick [this message]
2002-08-13 1:39 presotto
2002-08-13 3:14 ` Roman V. Shaposhnick
2002-08-13 3:31 Russ Cox
2002-08-13 3:33 presotto
2002-08-13 4:10 ` Alexander Viro
2002-08-13 5:39 ` Ronald G Minnich
2002-08-19 16:23 ` Boyd Roberts
2002-08-13 6:46 ` Andrew Lynch
2002-08-13 22:07 ` Roman V. Shaposhnick
2002-08-13 3:37 rob pike, esq.
2002-08-13 9:31 ` Douglas A. Gwyn
2002-08-13 4:20 Russ Cox
[not found] <rsc@plan9.bell-labs.com>
2002-08-13 5:42 ` Russ Cox
2002-08-13 5:53 ` Scott Schwartz
2002-08-13 6:05 ` Ronald G Minnich
2002-08-13 6:22 ` Alexander Viro
2002-08-13 6:13 ` Alexander Viro
2002-08-13 6:17 Charles Forsyth
2002-08-13 11:43 David Gordon Hogan
2002-08-13 15:45 ` Ronald G Minnich
2002-08-13 12:16 presotto
2002-08-13 15:53 ` Ronald G Minnich
2002-08-13 13:13 rog
2002-08-13 15:43 rob pike, esq.
2002-08-13 15:57 Russ Cox
2002-08-13 15:59 Russ Cox
2002-08-14 8:42 ` Douglas A. Gwyn
2002-08-13 16:37 anothy
2002-08-13 17:01 rob pike, esq.
2002-08-13 17:28 Russ Cox
2002-08-13 23:49 rog
2002-08-14 13:19 rob pike, esq.
2002-08-15 8:59 ` Douglas A. Gwyn
2002-08-15 16:22 ` Ronald G Minnich
2002-08-14 14:12 Russ Cox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020813052618.A10336@unicorn.math.spbu.ru \
--to=vugluskr@unicorn.math.spbu.ru \
--cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).