From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Subject: [9fans] Aug 20 license modification Message-ID: <20020907124249.B18375@cnm-vra.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i From: Micah Stetson Date: Sat, 7 Sep 2002 12:42:49 -0700 Topicbox-Message-UUID: e6a2afd0-eaca-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025 I hate to raise the spectre of license wars again, but I really must ask about this. I just updated my desktop machine from sources and noticed that the LICENSE file was changed. Diffing against the version on an ISO image I had lying around, I noticed something very disturbing: No right is granted to use, reproduce, modify, execute, display, perform, distribute or sublicense the Original Software or any modules or portions thereof as a part of, or in conjunction with, any other operating system or application. Doesn't this disallow the incorporation of any Plan 9 code into any other program/system? Wouldn't this prevent things like the port of factotum to unix (with integration into the system) that has been talked about on 9fans this last week? Also I noticed a lot of phrases like this: as [part of] an operating system substantially similar to functioning Plan 9 software in the places talking about allowed modification and redistribution. Looks like this bars any major changes to the system. So if the first clause above disallows reuse of the code in other products and the other phrase I quoted disallows major changes to the system. Does this mean that all we are allowed to do is fix bugs and add minor features? Must all major innovation come from the Labs? I don't for an instant imagine that anything of the sort is the intent of those who work on Plan 9 within Lucent, but what are we who are outside to do? Also, the last line of the license file says still says that it's version 1.1 of the license modified on 09/20/00. This cant' be right as the line is identical on the version I have without the above changes. Hoping I'm reading it all wrong, Micah