From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] fileserver hardware question (Sun)
Message-ID: <20020911001610.GF30051@ragnartech.net>
References: <20020910234522.GE30051@ragnartech.net> <6FB415BE-C51B-11D6-BA11-000A27AE643E@bway.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <6FB415BE-C51B-11D6-BA11-000A27AE643E@bway.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
From: Peter Downs <ragnar@ragnartech.net>
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 19:16:10 -0500
Topicbox-Message-UUID: e8c265d0-eaca-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 08:14:28PM -0400, John Packer wrote:
> It's a sparc v8, 32 bit compiler.  It wouldn't support ultrasparc
> kernels.

So, then, the logical next step is to write a sparcv9 compiler to add to
the collection.  That work being aside from porting the current plan 9 to
microsparc.

peter