From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Lucio De Re <lucio@proxima.alt.za>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] /sys/src/^(9 boot)^/pc/memory.c
Message-ID: <20020918061825.B6063@cackle.proxima.alt.za>
References: <0228435e85db81c478249ac5b9e1a6ca@plan9.bell-labs.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
In-Reply-To: <0228435e85db81c478249ac5b9e1a6ca@plan9.bell-labs.com>; from rob pike, esq. on Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 07:13:59PM -0400
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2002 06:18:25 +0200
Topicbox-Message-UUID: ee0168a2-eaca-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 07:13:59PM -0400, rob pike, esq. wrote:
> How much complexity should the kernel have - and require people to
> maintain -  for low-deployment devices?
>
Only as much as can't be put somewhere else.  That's the problem with
a monolithic kernel: _everything_ that needs to be in there will
eventually appear in it.

Was it dhog that was working on loadable kernel drivers?

++L