From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-Id: <200209251844.g8PIiGf28539@zamenhof.cs.utwente.nl>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] fs error msg: didn't like (1460 274) byte message
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 25 Sep 2002 14:24:23 -0400."
             <a14e85571895b8ff58bc08d27aa878ae@plan9.bell-labs.com>
References: <a14e85571895b8ff58bc08d27aa878ae@plan9.bell-labs.com>
From: Axel Belinfante <Axel.Belinfante@cs.utwente.nl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <28535.1032979456.1@zamenhof.cs.utwente.nl>
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 20:44:16 +0200
Topicbox-Message-UUID: f4ce5e10-eaca-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

> The problem is the buffer can be arbitrarily sized, though
> typically 8192+IOHDRSZ is the max a client and server will
> agree on.  Cpu uses a much larger max size to improve graphics
> performance.
>
> Here's a fixed xfer9p.  I forgot that the initial count
> includes itself.

I tried something like that, and what I tried did not work, but my failure
might differ from your xfer9p (have thrown it away, cannot compare).
Still I'm wondering, why use own code instead of simply using read9pmsg?

I'll try your xfer9p and let you know the result.

Axel.