From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: andrey mirtchovski To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Subject: Re: [9fans] Plan 9 as Unix client? In-Reply-To: <7dceea43f2a3f54f4664eff21621e81a@plan9.bell-labs.com> Message-ID: <20020930171801.F62747-100000@fbsd.acl.lanl.gov> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 17:26:24 -0600 Topicbox-Message-UUID: f9b2603e-eaca-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025 I've set up a dual boot (FBSD/P9) machine twice, once in 2000 (R3) and once a few months ago. Both times it seemed natural to install P9 first on its own primary partition and then leave the FBSD bootloader to recognize it later, when FBSD is installed. Both times it worked fine, with the exception that the 3.4 release MBR prompted me 'F1: Plan 9' and the current one (4.4, when it was installed) does a 'F1: ??'... Not a really useful post, but who knows -- someone may stumble upon it on google :) andrey On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, Russ Cox wrote: > I tried the FreeBSD MBR and couldn't make it boot > anything but Windows, though perhaps I broke something. > > hget http://pdos.lcs.mit.edu/~rsc/mbr.freebsd >/386/mbr.freebsd > disk/mbr -m /386/mbr.freebsd /dev/sdC0/data > > That's what didn't work for me. Is that the same > boot block you've got? > > Russ >