From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andrew <afrayedknot@thefrayedknot.armory.com>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] SSH Version2
Message-ID: <20021007160236.GA4066@thefrayedknot.armory.com>
References: <3615866249e25a424b3aa6af9c3b8dbe@plan9.bell-labs.com> <upsuoifgbrh212@corp.supernews.com> <20021007125129.GA25505@faui02>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20021007125129.GA25505@faui02>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
Date: Mon,  7 Oct 2002 09:02:36 -0700
Topicbox-Message-UUID: ff2f644e-eaca-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 02:51:29PM +0200, Markus Friedl wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 10:42:38AM +0000, Jeff Sickel wrote:
> > Russ Cox <rsc@plan9.bell-labs.com> wrote:
> > > our ssh client only does ssh1.
> >
> > yikes, does that mean Plan9 is subject to the ssh1 problems other systems are
> > warned not to pursue (via switching to ssh2)?
>
> what protocol 1 problems?
ever heard of ettercap? the ultimate in script kiddie packet sniffing
technology? it can break ssh1.
http://ettercap.sourceforge.net/