From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-Id: <200210260924.g9Q9OOs11171@zamenhof.cs.utwente.nl>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] bitsy uvlong & suspend are fine, thanks.
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 24 Oct 2002 10:13:56 +0200."
             <6839c726406c55ed0b6e5f42740842d2@plan9.escet.urjc.es>
References: <6839c726406c55ed0b6e5f42740842d2@plan9.escet.urjc.es>
From: Axel Belinfante <Axel.Belinfante@cs.utwente.nl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <11167.1035624263.1@zamenhof.cs.utwente.nl>
Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 11:24:24 +0200
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 0e69eede-eacb-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

Unfortunately, your 9bitsy gives me the same results as I had.
Have less time than I hoped; no time to compile,
only diff-ed your sources with mine , and (quick glance) did
not see many differences (aprt from my hacking).

I'm wondering why your kernel suspend/resumes for you but not
for me. Different hardware? Or could different bootloader
versions also play a role?

Axel.
> Axel, if you still have problems after trying this version of the
> sources just let me know.  They should compile without problems.  If
> they don't compile out of the box, it would mean that some other file
> in my /sys/src/9/port directory should also be added to the tar; let
> me know.