From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Roman V. Shaposhnick" <vugluskr@unicorn.math.spbu.ru>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] how to avoid a memset() optimization
Message-ID: <20021119102033.A13548@unicorn.math.spbu.ru>
References: <51251da60e579ed6058e741fa0dbff7b@plan9.bell-labs.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
In-Reply-To: <51251da60e579ed6058e741fa0dbff7b@plan9.bell-labs.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 10:20:33 +0300
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 23b46206-eacb-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 01:53:04AM -0500, Russ Cox wrote:
> >   He doesn't need to know about volatile -- that's the whole point.
> >   Once "experienced" programmer has set the buffer that way, the
> >   less experienced just gets less chance to screw himself up
>
> to make that stay?  Hmm?  The answer is not more crappy
> qualifiers.  The answer is clearly dumber compilers.

  Or may be the answer is
     #pragma get your hands off my data, your psycho

  ;)

Thanks,
Roman.