From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: andrey mirtchovski To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Subject: Re: [9fans] GCC3.0 [Was; Webbrowser] In-Reply-To: <7256bf2df02af553e48028e5332340bf@plan9.bell-labs.com> Message-ID: <20030206113325.O535@fbsd.cpsc.ucalgary.ca> References: <7256bf2df02af553e48028e5332340bf@plan9.bell-labs.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2003 11:35:16 -0700 Topicbox-Message-UUID: 522c4dd8-eacb-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025 this is the last message on this subject: https://lists.cse.psu.edu/archives/9fans/2002-May/017658.html (it doesn't appear on groups.google.com though, I don't know why -- maybe the pics attached are to blame?) indeed we were able to measure improvement in speed, but the behaviour was still strange, yet even stranger when iostats was involved. andrey On Thu, 6 Feb 2003, David Presotto wrote: > I was under the impression that Dong and I had fixed the TCP problems LANL was > having. Is this incorrect? Could you tell me what's still slow? I really > do want our IP stack to stay competative. Our next move is to take advantage > of the hardware checksuming on the gigabit boards since, in our most recent > testing, we seem to differ from BSD speeds most because of that.