From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: andrey mirtchovski To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Subject: Re: [9fans] Speaking of routing.... In-Reply-To: <200302132216.h1DMGrM23633@augusta.math.psu.edu> Message-ID: <20030213152152.U50928@fbsd.cpsc.ucalgary.ca> References: <200302132216.h1DMGrM23633@augusta.math.psu.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 15:24:08 -0700 Topicbox-Message-UUID: 5e2987b8-eacb-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025 I used a special acme just for reading mail (I had enough screen to do so) and ran a script to bind the proper namespace before reading the mail.dump file... Wasn't it the case that certain programs would look for a stack in /net.alt if the /net one timeouted? Can't remember :( andrey On Thu, 13 Feb 2003, Dan Cross wrote: > Thanks, Skip and Andrey, > Unfortunately, I was hoping to avoid any mucking with namespaces, > particularly for automated things (like outgoing mail). Alas, it > seems impossible. Maybe I should go back to running both interfaces > on the same IP stack. Hmm.... > > - Dan C. >