From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christopher Nielsen To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Subject: Re: [9fans] iSCSI Message-ID: <20030213203610.GQ54927@cassie.foobarbaz.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 12:36:10 -0800 Topicbox-Message-UUID: 5df27c3c-eacb-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025 Better yet, NFS over SMTP. On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 03:13:08PM -0500, David Presotto wrote: > Don't deflate my sails! I was about to suggest eSCSI where each SCSI command is > carried as a separate MIME attachment. > From: "Ronald G. Minnich" > To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu > Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 13:08:16 -0700 (MST) > Subject: Re: [9fans] iSCSI > > On Thu, 13 Feb 2003, matt wrote: > > > I expect that iSCSI has already hit your radar but here's the latest > > > > iSCSI Gets Go-Ahead > > Am I the only person in the world who can't figure out why anyone wants > iSCSI? I just can't get it to make sense. My brain just won't go near it. > > ron -- Christopher Nielsen - Metal-wielding pyro techie "They who can give up essential liberty for temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety." --Benjamin Franklin