From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lucio De Re To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Subject: Re: [9fans] fs administration: how do people update multi-user fs? Message-ID: <20030215172922.H9084@cackle.proxima.alt.za> References: <20030215114930.C9084@cackle.proxima.alt.za> <11f738f5d2a818ed41e56c96688f8196@plan9.bell-labs.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <11f738f5d2a818ed41e56c96688f8196@plan9.bell-labs.com>; from Russ Cox on Sat, Feb 15, 2003 at 09:18:09AM -0500 Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2003 17:29:22 +0200 Topicbox-Message-UUID: 61d9e1aa-eacb-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025 On Sat, Feb 15, 2003 at 09:18:09AM -0500, Russ Cox wrote: > > In no case should you end up with files owned by rob or by none. > In the more general case of unwinding an archive such as tar files, I'm sure I've had situations where a non-existent user was translated to "none". But I've had so many dicky installations of Plan 9, from 2ed to the present, that I could have been hoisting myself on my own petard. Still, I have seen odd situations, so I'm sure the warning is not unjustified. ++L