From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 01:53:40 -0500
From: William Josephson <jkw@eecs.harvard.edu>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] spam avoidance
Message-ID: <20030224065340.GA68608@mero.morphisms.net>
References: <200302240542.h1O5g1M29673@augusta.math.psu.edu> <50d52c4fe14ade63d6aa4412b3c6fdfe@mightycheese.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <50d52c4fe14ade63d6aa4412b3c6fdfe@mightycheese.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 6ffd4e3e-eacb-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

On Sun, Feb 23, 2003 at 10:47:49PM -0800, rob pike, esq. wrote:
> > That doesn't conform to the HTML DTD.
>
> Then your HTML detector shouldn't reject it.

... yielding a filter that is about 0% effective
for the intended purpose ...