From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Martin C.Atkins To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Subject: Re: [9fans] A proposal regarding # in bind Message-Id: <20030225194738.7e15f8c7.martin@mca-ltd.com> In-Reply-To: <88d55e19d3c1fd25c04ef8921f35413d@plan9.bell-labs.com> References: <20030225193133.21c658c1.martin@mca-ltd.com> <88d55e19d3c1fd25c04ef8921f35413d@plan9.bell-labs.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 19:47:38 +0530 Topicbox-Message-UUID: 7221c4ec-eacb-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025 On Tue, 25 Feb 2003 09:11:46 -0500 "Russ Cox" wrote: > > Like I've said in another message, I'd prefer there to be no (user-visible) > > way to mount /ur, only a way to unmount it! > > How would you implement newns? > Newns should only work if /proto is mounted, right? Just like it shouldn't work after a pctl(NODEVS). Or is newns more powerful than I had appreciated? Martin -- Martin C. Atkins martin@mca-ltd.com Mission Critical Applications Ltd, U.K. http://www.mca-ltd.com