From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andrew <afrayedknot@thefrayedknot.armory.com>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] fast compilers
Message-ID: <20030405003114.GA24752@thefrayedknot.armory.com>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0304041518190.24389-100000@fbsd.cpsc.ucalgary.ca> <20030404230234.GA24395@thefrayedknot.armory.com> <20030404230724.GA43336@mero.morphisms.net> <20030405001449.GA24682@thefrayedknot.armory.com> <20030405002838.GA43975@mero.morphisms.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20030405002838.GA43975@mero.morphisms.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
Date: Fri,  4 Apr 2003 16:31:14 -0800
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 8b134610-eacb-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 07:28:38PM -0500, William Josephson wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 04:14:49PM -0800, Andrew wrote:
> > ie plan9, which is great in that respect afaik). I can cite plenty of
> > examples of large software projects that are unreasonably bulky and slow
> > if you'd like... mozilla, xfree86, glibc...all much too large and far
> > too slow.
>
> Proof by example? :-p
it (big often equals slow) is a common enough occurence that you'd think
I wouldnt have to defend myself on it, apparently not.