From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lucio De Re To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Subject: Re: [9fans] ndb/csquery: what is dns is not up? Message-ID: <20030423152928.P19261@cackle.proxima.alt.za> References: <20030423145118.J19261@cackle.proxima.alt.za> <5aef431f2c21560026646d6f28fac866@plan9.bell-labs.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <5aef431f2c21560026646d6f28fac866@plan9.bell-labs.com>; from David Presotto on Wed, Apr 23, 2003 at 09:17:10AM -0400 Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 15:29:29 +0200 Topicbox-Message-UUID: 96c61636-eacb-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025 On Wed, Apr 23, 2003 at 09:17:10AM -0400, David Presotto wrote: > > I don't see a way around this without rewriting code. If the sshnet cs simulation > actually looked in your /lib/ndb or if authdial looked in your /lib/ndb files after > not finding things in /net/cs, you'ld have a chance of making it work. At least you confirmed what I suspected. I guess I can try to add a feature or two to sshnet and factotum so that this becomes possible. That leaves me wondering how I got to interpret the factotum docs as suggesting that factotum itself did not do its own communications. I'll have to re-read the documentation. ++L