From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lucio De Re To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Subject: Re: [9fans] ndb/csquery: what is dns is not up? Message-ID: <20030423153407.R19261@cackle.proxima.alt.za> References: <20030423151624.M19261@cackle.proxima.alt.za> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: ; from David Presotto on Wed, Apr 23, 2003 at 09:20:06AM -0400 Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 15:34:07 +0200 Topicbox-Message-UUID: 96cc353e-eacb-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025 On Wed, Apr 23, 2003 at 09:20:06AM -0400, David Presotto wrote: > > Your message suggests a better solution than mine. Just change sshnet to allow > also implement /net/ndb and have sshnet's simulated /net search that first. It > would make it a lot more useful. I don't have time right now, but perhaps you > do? Lack of self-confidence is a bigger problem, but I will look into it. I suppose just copying the original /net/ndb would be a step forward. Making it editable would be nice. A new factotum becomes a necessity, I think I'll need an option to kill it, then, maybe a control command that the first factotum does not respond to? ++L