From: Axel Belinfante <Axel.Belinfante@cs.utwente.nl>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] fdisk: reported number/size of cylinders changes
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2003 16:03:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200306021403.h52E34215452@zamenhof.cs.utwente.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 02 Jun 2003 09:38:42 -0400." <e62ffe300b697c2c18dd5a87d8e94fb5@plan9.bell-labs.com>
I booted plan 9 in the same way in both cases
(kernel from flop, fs over the net).
In /sys/src/libdisk/disk.c I found the following comment
near the opendisk code, which explains the difference between
opening a ``clean'' empty disk, and one already containing
a partition table. However, I would have expected that
reading (and using) the partition table on disk would
give me back the number previously shown (and, written,
I assume), by fdisk when I ran it first time.
Axel.
Comment found in /sys/src/libdisk/disk.c:
* Discover the disk geometry by various sleazeful means.
*
* First, if there is a partition table in sector 0,
* see if all the partitions have the same end head
* and sector; if so, we'll assume that that's the
* right count.
*
* If that fails, we'll try looking at the geometry that the ATA
* driver supplied, if any, and translate that as a
* BIOS might.
*
* If that too fails, which should only happen on a SCSI
* disk with no currently defined partitions, we'll try
* various common (h, s) pairs used by BIOSes when faking
* the geometries.
[maybe I should check that for the clean disk the
second case is used, and not the third]
> Did you happen to get to plan 9 differently in the two instances?
> It could be that you're just seeing two different logical geometries
> of the same disk. In LBA mode, we don't use the logical geometries
> except to determine the number of disk blocks, so you should be OK
> in both cases (modulo the fact that one comes out to less sectors).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-06-02 14:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-06-02 12:48 Axel Belinfante
2003-06-02 13:38 ` David Presotto
2003-06-02 14:03 ` Axel Belinfante [this message]
2003-06-02 14:09 ` David Presotto
2003-06-02 14:20 ` Axel Belinfante
2003-06-03 1:57 ` Russ Cox, rsc
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200306021403.h52E34215452@zamenhof.cs.utwente.nl \
--to=axel.belinfante@cs.utwente.nl \
--cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).