From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Damian Gerow <dgerow@afflictions.org>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] The new ridiculous license
Message-ID: <20030617175011.GD3197@afflictions.org>
References: <4cbc04991719186c54750d1f0b6eb015@plan9.bell-labs.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4cbc04991719186c54750d1f0b6eb015@plan9.bell-labs.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 13:50:12 -0400
Topicbox-Message-UUID: cc5c7740-eacb-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

Thus spake Russ Cox (rsc@plan9.bell-labs.com) [17/06/03 12:42]:
> You might notice that OSI didn't approve clause 7.
> (See http://plan9.bell-labs.com/hidden/osi-diff.html.)

So is there a final revision of the license that we can read, without having
to include external amendments that are 'hidden'?