From: "Todd C. Miller" <Todd.Miller@courtesan.com>
To: 9fans@collyer.net
Subject: Re: [9fans] Plan 9 Usenix BOF, 12 June 2003
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 11:54:35 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200306171754.h5HHsaZR028481@xerxes.courtesan.com> (raw)
> The licence has been changed and I don't really understand the
> implications, except that the Open Source Institute blessed the
> penultimate version and declared it officially ``open source''. See
> plan9.bell-labs.com/hidden/nntemplate.html. It might be worth
> pointing the OpenBSD folks at this licence if they are serious about
> using the Plan 9 C compilers.
Unfortunately, OpenBSD can't really use the compiler unless it has
a license similar to that used by MIT, UC Berkeley, or the ISC.
Our goals are quite different from the OSI; we favor licenses that
are both clear and concise (the text of our preferred license is
just 10 lines on an 80-column terminal) and, most importantly, that
don't require a lawyer to interpret. Anything that creates a
tortious liability for us is simply not acceptable as we have no
financial means of defending ourselves.
As it stands, the new Lucent license is not something we can use.
This is unfortunate as continued development and expansion of the
plan9 toolchain is in the best interests of both the plan9 community
and the open source community at large. It would mean development
of additional CPU targets that could be used to bootstrap ports of
plan9 to currently unsupported platforms.
- todd
next reply other threads:[~2003-06-17 17:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-06-17 17:54 Todd C. Miller [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-06-16 23:43 Geoff Collyer
2003-06-16 23:51 ` ron minnich
2003-06-17 2:24 ` Russ Cox
2003-06-17 3:22 ` northern snowfall
2003-06-17 2:39 ` Russ Cox
2003-06-17 3:39 ` northern snowfall
2003-06-18 0:45 ` Geoff Collyer
2003-06-18 0:53 ` George Michaelson
2003-06-18 5:53 ` boyd, rounin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200306171754.h5HHsaZR028481@xerxes.courtesan.com \
--to=todd.miller@courtesan.com \
--cc=9fans@collyer.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).