From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Markus Friedl <markus@openbsd.org>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Cc: hangar18-general@open-forge.org, hell@einstein.ssz.com
Subject: Re: [9fans] Re: The new ridiculous license
Message-ID: <20030621091652.GB24882@folly>
References: <11085765386d7572968a06a2ee05f689@plan9.bell-labs.com> <Pine.LNX.4.33.0306201530330.1657-100000@einstein.ssz.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0306201530330.1657-100000@einstein.ssz.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2003 11:16:52 +0200
Topicbox-Message-UUID: d5052e14-eacb-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

On Fri, Jun 20, 2003 at 03:46:21PM -0500, Jim Choate wrote:
> Why can't Lucent just release Plan 9 under a GPL?

because the GPL would not help when trying to replace gcc....