From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Lucio De Re <lucio@proxima.alt.za>
To: 9fans <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] survey
Message-ID: <20030704125129.N16824@cackle.proxima.alt.za>
References: <000f01c34218$f6855f50$2a8be793@gli.cas.cz>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
In-Reply-To: <000f01c34218$f6855f50$2a8be793@gli.cas.cz>; from pac on Fri, Jul 04, 2003 at 12:42:27PM +0200
Date: Fri,  4 Jul 2003 12:51:30 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Topicbox-Message-UUID: e8c64514-eacb-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

On Fri, Jul 04, 2003 at 12:42:27PM +0200, pac wrote:
>=20
> dear folks,
> i=A7m writing a paper introducing my "neXt" archive of plan9 software t=
o
   ^ this is no quote/apostrophe!
> biologists. would like
> to know YOUR opinion on comparison with selected other oses. hope youll=
 take
> a minute
> to help me be less subjective. pls, put scores into the following table=
,
> 1=3Dworst, 5=3Dbest.
>=20
> FEEL FREE TO ADD MORE LINES, if you wish ;-)
>=20
I think you need to go the tick-box route:  For each feature you
probably want to rate the operating system in some fashion.  Perhaps:


>                       Win    Mac    Sun    SGI    Linux/BSD    Plan9
>=20
> design               [  ]    [  ]   [  ]   [  ]   [  ]         [  ]
>=20
etc.  And please don't offend anyone by merging the *BSDs with Linux.

++L