From: Dan Cross <cross@math.psu.edu>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] 'find'
Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2003 15:08:59 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200307071909.h67J90715367@augusta.math.psu.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 07 Jul 2003 08:33:44 GMT." <3F07C5D3.7030808@null.net>
> >>err, this *does* beg the question; what's wrong with `grep pattern foo'?
> > yes
>
> What's wrong with grep pattern foo is that it acts differently
> from grep pattern foo1 foo2. Whether or not the filename is
> displayed as a prefix should be controlled by a command option,
> not by how many file arguments there are.
grep pattern <file* doesn't work. cat file* | grep pattern does.
My question originally referred to replacing indirection, not with
worrying about multiple arguments.
- Dan C.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-07-07 19:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-06-29 16:57 D. Brownlee
2003-06-29 16:59 ` Sape Mullender
2003-06-30 14:07 ` rog
2003-06-30 14:18 ` Scott Schwartz
2003-06-30 14:50 ` rog
2003-07-03 9:42 ` Douglas A. Gwyn
2003-07-03 10:03 ` Fco.J.Ballesteros, nemo
2003-07-03 15:14 ` rob pike, esq.
2003-07-03 12:57 ` matt
2003-07-03 16:59 ` Douglas A. Gwyn
2003-07-03 17:09 ` matt
2003-06-30 15:30 ` Dan Cross
2003-07-03 12:11 ` Kenji Arisawa
2003-06-29 18:11 ` Jack Johnson
2003-06-29 18:42 ` Dan Cross
2003-07-04 14:08 ` Ralph Corderoy
2003-07-05 18:38 ` Dan Cross
2003-07-06 3:11 ` boyd, rounin
2003-07-07 8:33 ` Douglas A. Gwyn
2003-07-07 10:49 ` boyd, rounin
2003-07-07 14:05 ` Douglas A. Gwyn
2003-07-07 15:46 ` rob pike, esq.
2003-07-07 19:18 ` Dan Cross
2003-07-07 19:26 ` David Presotto
2003-07-07 19:46 ` Dan Cross
2003-07-07 19:08 ` Dan Cross [this message]
2003-07-07 19:21 ` Dan Cross
2003-07-08 8:31 ` Douglas A. Gwyn
2003-07-08 11:20 ` Dan Cross
2003-07-06 16:12 ` Jack Johnson
2003-07-06 22:20 ` matt
2003-07-07 13:28 ` Ralph Corderoy
2003-07-07 19:13 ` Dan Cross
2003-06-30 7:47 ` Fco.J.Ballesteros, nemo
2003-06-30 7:55 ` boyd, rounin
2003-06-30 14:32 ` Dan Cross
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200307071909.h67J90715367@augusta.math.psu.edu \
--to=cross@math.psu.edu \
--cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).