From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-Id: <200307091945.h69JjT728195@augusta.math.psu.edu>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] Fork: useless and painful?
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 09 Jul 2003 21:39:54 +0200."
             <003001c34651$df539d00$b9844051@insultant.net>
From: Dan Cross <cross@math.psu.edu>
Date: Wed,  9 Jul 2003 15:45:29 -0400
Topicbox-Message-UUID: f06916de-eacb-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

> i tend to agree.  look what they did to ls(1) on lunix ...

Okay, this *raises* the question (Hi, Matt!): What *did* they do to
ls on lunix?  The only thing I've noticed about it is that they've
changed around the default sorting order, and I can't find a way to
get the traditional behavior.  Actually, it's really irritating.

	- Dan C.