From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Derek Fawcus <dfawcus@cisco.com>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] Fork: useless and painful?
Message-ID: <20030709210515.A6186@edinburgh.cisco.com>
References: <003001c34651$df539d00$b9844051@insultant.net> <200307091945.h69JjT728195@augusta.math.psu.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
In-Reply-To: <200307091945.h69JjT728195@augusta.math.psu.edu>; from cross@math.psu.edu on Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 03:45:29PM -0400
Date: Wed,  9 Jul 2003 21:05:15 +0100
Topicbox-Message-UUID: f06f6624-eacb-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 03:45:29PM -0400, Dan Cross wrote:
> The only thing I've noticed about it is that they've
> changed around the default sorting order, and I can't find a way to
> get the traditional behavior.  Actually, it's really irritating.

I find it really bloody annoying,  however 'LC_ALL=C ls' put's things
back the way they should be...