From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 22:33:09 -0400
From: William Josephson <jkw@eecs.harvard.edu>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] gcc/plan9
Message-ID: <20030717023309.GC10157@mero.morphisms.net>
References: <5f9238aeb651f621030bbcc5bf017170@plan9.bell-labs.com> <200307170222.h6H2M2715827@augusta.math.psu.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <200307170222.h6H2M2715827@augusta.math.psu.edu>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
Topicbox-Message-UUID: f9454070-eacb-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 10:22:02PM -0400, Dan Cross wrote:
> I really would like to see lex (or an evolution of it) brought up
> to speed with respect to the modern world.  The idea of a lexical
> analyser generator is a good one, even if the implementation is a
> little behind the times.

I suppose, but who uses lex with C anymore?