From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 22:33:09 -0400 From: William Josephson To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Subject: Re: [9fans] gcc/plan9 Message-ID: <20030717023309.GC10157@mero.morphisms.net> References: <5f9238aeb651f621030bbcc5bf017170@plan9.bell-labs.com> <200307170222.h6H2M2715827@augusta.math.psu.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200307170222.h6H2M2715827@augusta.math.psu.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Topicbox-Message-UUID: f9454070-eacb-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025 On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 10:22:02PM -0400, Dan Cross wrote: > I really would like to see lex (or an evolution of it) brought up > to speed with respect to the modern world. The idea of a lexical > analyser generator is a good one, even if the implementation is a > little behind the times. I suppose, but who uses lex with C anymore?