From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lucio De Re To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Subject: Re: [9fans] Venti for Fossil Message-ID: <20030730065455.Z1666@cackle.proxima.alt.za> References: <77da6dc262ebb960e06310ac8a4841ac@proxima.alt.za> <8a51f11f68080b5088ece6a439186c84@granite.cias.osakafu-u.ac.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <8a51f11f68080b5088ece6a439186c84@granite.cias.osakafu-u.ac.jp>; from okamoto@granite.cias.osakafu-u.ac.jp on Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 01:14:57PM +0900 Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 06:54:56 +0200 Topicbox-Message-UUID: 0a391122-eacc-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025 On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 01:14:57PM +0900, okamoto@granite.cias.osakafu-u.ac.jp wrote: > > I'm engaging this venti+fossil fighting now. ? > I've added a "-n" option to venti/fmtarenas so that I can specify the number of arenas instead of the size. It's a small fix and I believe it to be useful at least for experimentation. Should I submit it here? Can anyone think of a reason _not_ to add it? I couldn't find a good way of extending this to pick a different: tabSize = 64 * 1024; /* BUG: should be determine from number of arenas */ (sic) as the relationship isn't obvious (to me). If anyone can suggest how to do it, I'll be happy to include it in my patch. ++L PS: venti/syncindex fails (for me) as soon as there is something in Venti. Is this expected?