From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: splite@purdue.edu
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] Re: 9p & read-ahead
Message-ID: <20030731100731.A12927@sigint.cs.purdue.edu>
References: <28cbe19e5474cf6db7ca08daae97e949@yourdomain.dom> <Pine.LNX.4.33.0307310626500.15683-100000@einstein.ssz.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0307310626500.15683-100000@einstein.ssz.com>; from ravage@einstein.ssz.com on Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 06:27:24AM -0500
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 10:07:31 -0500
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 0c7e7788-eacc-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 06:27:24AM -0500, Jim Choate wrote:
>
> On Thu, 31 Jul 2003 steve.simon@snellwilcox.com wrote:
>
> > Anyone any strong views about this?
>
> Add a switch so that anyone who does in a negative way can turn it off.

And a light to indicate that it's on.

And a rheostat to control how much it reads ahead.