From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: splite@purdue.edu
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] shared memory
Message-ID: <20030912153301.GB3969@sigint.cs.purdue.edu>
References: <60c7fdf45121206846fb9f34f2588b77@collyer.net> <b264a90e165c80f5da8e84351220e8ae@caldo.demon.co.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <b264a90e165c80f5da8e84351220e8ae@caldo.demon.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 10:33:01 -0500
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 32b5285c-eacc-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 10:30:57AM +0100, Charles Forsyth wrote:
> >>If you're looking for a way for unrelated processes to share memory, I
> >>think your best bet is to use the undocumented S option of ramfs:
>
> there is also segment(3), when configured.

Did anyone else read that and wonder "how do you ment a seg?"

I need more coffee.  Or maybe a frosty Hires "High Resolution" root beer.