From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Derek Fawcus To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Subject: Positrons (was Re: [9fans] g++) Message-ID: <20030915172048.C25502@edinburgh.cisco.com> References: <5.1.1.6.0.20030915100743.00a98ff0@pop.monitorbm.co.nz> <20030915145443.GA8164@sigint.cs.purdue.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20030915145443.GA8164@sigint.cs.purdue.edu>; from splite@purdue.edu on Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 09:54:43AM -0500 Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 17:20:48 +0100 Topicbox-Message-UUID: 3808bbd4-eacc-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025 On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 09:54:43AM -0500, splite@purdue.edu wrote: > You'd still need to slap it with a phased verteron pulse, which would > depolarize the resonance frequency generators and generate a subspace > field implosion, inducing a reload of the positronic subprocessors from > the protected memory archive. Duh. One thing I always found amusing about the use of 'positronics' vs electronics in SF was what heppens if the back up battery is turned off? *poof* Daneel's head vanished in a flash of blinding light and gamma rays. DF