From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Derek Fawcus <dfawcus@cisco.com>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] ISP filtering - update
Message-ID: <20030925231952.C7137@edinburgh.cisco.com>
References: <029b01c383ab$855089c0$b9844051@insultant.net> <fd8e0bd23fec289a330752f35336ee41@plan9.bell-labs.com> <029b01c383ab$855089c0$b9844051@insultant.net> <20030925223637.D26720@edinburgh.cisco.com> <5.1.1.6.0.20030926094929.03366d70@pop.monitorbm.co.nz>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
In-Reply-To: <5.1.1.6.0.20030926094929.03366d70@pop.monitorbm.co.nz>; from andrew.simmons@monitorbm.co.nz on Fri, Sep 26, 2003 at 09:50:17AM +1200
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2003 23:19:53 +0100
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 4d189d64-eacc-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

On Fri, Sep 26, 2003 at 09:50:17AM +1200, Andrew Simmons wrote:
>
> It wasn't an infinitive anyway. Is it even possible to split an infinitive
> in Latin?

That's the point.  Latin has single word infinitives,  English doesn't.

The whole 'split infinitive' crusade seems to have been started by some
nutty Grammer School teachers who have wanted to make comparisions to
Latin.