From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Derek Fawcus To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Subject: Re: [9fans] Thoughts on squashing the spam bug. Message-ID: <20030929002124.H28514@edinburgh.cisco.com> References: <200309282035.h8SKZSj10101@augusta.math.psu.edu> <0b44bf18cd9b6fc09bc6739654620101@sdgm.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <0b44bf18cd9b6fc09bc6739654620101@sdgm.net>; from boyd@sdgm.net on Sun, Sep 28, 2003 at 06:49:15PM -0400 Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 00:21:24 +0100 Topicbox-Message-UUID: 53dc8386-eacc-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025 On Sun, Sep 28, 2003 at 06:49:15PM -0400, boyd@sdgm.net wrote: > If you can somehow convince Dan Bernstein to implement it > > that's a big fucking _if_. Well he seems to have already come to the conclusion that some form of postage is needed for email... Mind there are a lot of addon patches distributed for qmail, and it's quite easy to plug things into it. So one could produce an alternate transport mechanism as a program to run instead of the qmail-smtpd and qmail-remote (? can't remember which is SMTP client) programs. DF