From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lucio De Re To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Subject: Re: [9fans] Multi-stack mail problem. Message-ID: <20030930100020.B8268@cackle.proxima.alt.za> References: <200309300048.h8U0mUj16473@augusta.math.psu.edu> <059e0e4c3d608815aebfbb2f219e5ac9@plan9.bell-labs.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <059e0e4c3d608815aebfbb2f219e5ac9@plan9.bell-labs.com>; from David Presotto on Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 09:12:04PM -0400 Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 10:00:20 +0200 Topicbox-Message-UUID: 567cd88e-eacc-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025 On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 09:12:04PM -0400, David Presotto wrote: > > That sounds exactly like out setup. Dial(2) actually tries first > /net and then /net.alt, which is a terrible hack I did years ago > to deal with out situation. However it continues to work for us. > Would it be out of the question to teach dial to consult the routing table(s)? Plan 9 makes networking so painless, it is hard to become an expert, so questions like this may have obvious answers that are anything but obvious :-) ++L