From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-Id: <200310051654.h95Gslj18325@augusta.math.psu.edu>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] IMAP clients and plan9 imap server
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 05 Oct 2003 15:37:43 +0200."
             <86r81rdcuw.fsf@gic.mteege.de>
From: Dan Cross <cross@math.psu.edu>
Date: Sun,  5 Oct 2003 12:54:46 -0400
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 5fce3edc-eacc-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

Matthias Teege <matthias-9fans@mteege.de> writes:
>
> boyd@sdgm.net writes:
>
> > pop - highway to hell
> > imap - superhighway to hell
>
> mut% nmap www.sdgm.net
>
> Starting nmap 3.27 ( www.insecure.org/nmap/ ) at 2003-10-05 15:34 CEST
> Interesting ports on brahma.sdgm.net (64.32.179.49):
> (The 1613 ports scanned but not shown below are in state: closed)
> Port       State       Service
> 22/tcp     open        ssh
> 25/tcp     open        smtp
> 53/tcp     open        domain
> 80/tcp     open        http
> 110/tcp    open        pop-3
> 113/tcp    open        auth
> 443/tcp    open        https
> 567/tcp    open        banyan-rpc
> 993/tcp    open        imaps
> 17007/tcp  open        isode-dua
>
> I'm with you ... ;-)

Umm, I own sdgm.net (the hardware, domain, etc), so it's configured the
way *I* like it.  Boyd just uses it.  He's entitled to his opinions, but
if you're making a judgement on those based on what services run on
sdgm.net, you're doing so under false pretenses; it's really my opinions
you're judging.  :-)

	- Dan C.

(Which, for the record, in this case are: Hey, a POP and IMAP server
would be useful for the mostly non-Plan 9 types who use the system....)